Prioritise education
IN many communities across Fiji, our actions show that a child’s education is often treated as a second or even last priority.
Whenever there is a church soli, a wedding, a funeral, or a vanua gathering, attendance is massive. Both parents and guardians turn up in full force, giving their time, energy, and money without hesitation. Yet, when schools organise parent-teacher interviews (PTIs) or fundraising and support activities, the turnout is consistently poor. In most schools, it is largely the mothers who carry the burden of showing up, while fathers are noticeably absent.
Even more concerning is the number of students who miss days of school to attend village or family functions. When we pull children out of class for social or traditional obligations, we send a clear message that school is not important. This mindset devalues education in the eyes of our young people and sets them on a troubling path.
Our culture, faith, and traditional obligations are vital parts of who we are. However, they should never come at the expense of our children’s future. If we truly want strong, capable leaders for tomorrow, both parents and guardians must step up today.
It is time to shift our priorities. Let us show the same commitment to our school gates that we do to our village halls and church gatherings. Our children deserve nothing less.
Paula Kaloukocei Levuka, Ovalau
Next election
MY feeling is that the country will go to the polls by February 2027.
Despite the unsettling political climate, I believe the Prime Minister will call the next general election because he has little choice.
If that happens, I urge every eligible voter to participate and choose wisely. Do not be swayed by false promises or impressive speeches.
Instead, assess each candidate’s record of service, contribution to the community, integrity, and character. Consider whether their actions reflect the values they claim to uphold.
Before casting your vote, take time to understand the candidates and their plans.
Ask questions, examine their track records, and decide who is best equipped to serve the public responsibly.
Do not vote blindly, only to regret your choice later.
This election will be an important opportunity to choose the leaders entrusted with our well-being, safety, and future.
Let us approach that responsibility thoughtfully and vote for candidates who have demonstrated honesty, competence, and a genuine commitment to the people.
Suresh Chand Nadi
New rubbish dump site
I HAVE noted that if any empty space within the housing residential community is vacant for a while, people within that community will slowly discard their rubbish there.
It will start off small then it will grow and other people from other areas will start dumping their rubbish at the same site.
Later, one will notice all sorts of rubbish dumped at the said site. During the hours of darkness, vehicles will drive by and dump their rubbish and in the morning, one will notice garbage bags, empty cartons at the site.
While people dump their rubbish, the stray dogs will scavenge and scatter the same, creating a mess within the surrounding and to residents living near that newly created rubbish dump site.
I just hope the relevant authorities will continue to monitor and erect their notice boards of no dumping of rubbish at these sites.
Nasinu Town Council, take note of this newly created dump site at the corner of Borete Rd and Uga Rd.
Juki Fong Chew Nadawa, Nasinu
Chairs for cashiers
A LETTER writer is pushing for chairs for supermarket cashiers.
I recall Hon Rinesh Sharma’s thoughts and suggestions on this humane act. What happened?
Kirti Patel Lautoka
Frustrating daily traffic
I wish to express my frustration and disappointment with the Fiji Police Force over the decision to establish multiple checkpoints along the Laqere, Nakasi and Rewa Bridge routes, particularly during the night.
What exactly are we trying to achieve with this arrangement? If the intention is to impose a curfew, then have the courage to announce one. Tell the people of Fiji that they are expected to be home by 10pm, and most ordinary citizens will plan accordingly. But do not subject an entire community to unnecessary traffic congestion every night without providing a proper explanation.
The moment 10pm approaches, a massive queue begins forming, stretching all the way from Nasole in Nasinu. This is becoming ridiculous. Fuel prices are already expensive and placing enormous pressure on ordinary Fijian households. Why should motorists be forced to waste additional fuel sitting in unnecessary queues? At a time when families are struggling with the cost of living, the police force should be mindful of the financial burden its decisions place on the public.
For an ordinary working Fijian, the day has become a cycle of frustration. Leaving for work in the morning means traffic. Going out during lunch means traffic. Returning home in the afternoon means traffic. Even attempting to enjoy a little leisure time after 9pm means facing another queue. This is no longer a minor inconvenience. It is mental torture, a waste of valuable time and money, and an unnecessary irritation for thousands of motorists.
What makes the situation even more frustrating is the apparent absence of any publicly communicated strategy. It feels as though instructions have simply come from the top, and everyone is expected to follow them without question. What is the objective? What are these checkpoints intended to prevent? Are they producing measurable results? Are there statistics showing a reduction in crime, road offences, or other incidents as a result of these operations?
I want to see actual figures and data from the Fiji Police Force. If these checkpoints are achieving something meaningful, then communicate it to the public. Show us the results. Explain the rationale. The public deserves more than silence and the expectation that it should simply accept whatever is imposed.
The most frustrating checkpoint, in my view, is the one at Laqere. Its positioning is particularly questionable, given the presence of traffic lights and vehicles approaching from multiple directions. Placing a checkpoint in an already busy traffic area only compounds congestion and creates another unnecessary bottleneck. Surely, operational planning should take basic traffic management into consideration.
Nobody is questioning the need for law enforcement. Nobody is suggesting that the Police should stop carrying out their duties. Public safety, crime prevention and maintaining law and order are important responsibilities. However, policing must also be intelligent, proportionate and properly planned. Maintaining law and order should not mean making ordinary citizens pay the price for poorly communicated and seemingly poorly coordinated decisions.
The Fiji Police Force cannot expect public cooperation while failing to explain the purpose, necessity and effectiveness of measures that directly affect people’s everyday lives. The public is not asking for special treatment. We are asking for common sense, transparency and accountability.
Our roads are not police parking lots, and the time and money of ordinary Fijians should not be treated as expendable.
If these checkpoints are necessary, tell us why. If they are working, show us the evidence. And if there is no compelling justification for subjecting thousands of motorists to this nightly ordeal, then it is time to reconsider the strategy.
Law enforcement should make our communities safer, not make everyday life unnecessarily difficult for the very people it is supposed to serve.
Raynav Chand JP Maharaj Street, Nakasi
Bizarre dream
The other night I had a weird dream and maybe it’s the severe side effects of the current super El Nino. In my dream, I was on a hill rushing down among the tall grasses only half illuminated by the moon. I can hear the steps of people ahead of me, jumping to avoid snags just like I was doing. My face is hot and sweaty and my heart is beating hard in my chest. I could see people disappear into the darkness. Suddenly I tripped over an object on the ground and could not bring my other leg forward fast enough to prevent the fall. Landing face first only to realise that I had tripped over the bucket of water I was going to use to mix my grog. Dou bula!
Wise Muavono Balawa, Lautoka
Landscapes and escapes
Interesting times ahead. Turbulence ahead. With the constitution questions and answers still in limbo, with the latest reinstatement of the third DPM, with the current status quo on agreement and disagreement regarding the looming third reading, it will be interesting to see how the trading churns out. Let’s see what they give and take, ie., compromise. Let’s see how they vote. If there’s solidarity, it better be for our good. The lack of it also better be for our good.
Donald Singh Nausori
I’m glad it is over!
I am glad it’s over, says Prof Prasad (FT 13/11/26). I hope it is for the NFP leader. Time will tell.
Rajend Naidu Sydney, Australia
FNPF saga
Reading Shaista Shameem’s letter in The Fiji Times (FT 9/11), I feel confident, with hope in FNPF that “there is light at the end of the tunnel”. Let’s continue to fight for our rights.
I believe we retired remaining FNPF pensioners will have an early Christmas and happy new year. Long live FNPF to secure a future for Fijians with cost-of-living adjustments.
God bless.
Tahir Ali Hamilton, New Zealand
When voting
Any voting should be done with caution no doubt. It is that decision that reveals a lot about them.
Kirti Patel Lautoka
Uru visits Nabua school!
The staff of Nabua Secondary School warmly welcomed Serupepeli Uru, the famous Queensland Reds rugby player, after his marriage to the love of his life, Lusiana Turuva.
The Reds backrower was farewelled by the Reds alongside Flying Fijian flyhalf Ben Volavola.
According to the Queensland Reds Rugby Union, “Seru made an important impact over a lengthy period at the club.”
The 29-year-old Reds versatile forward played 78 times for the Reds since making his debut in 2020. His fine form was rewarded with two Test caps for the Wallabies in 2024.
Uru is a robust player, but he is humble and down-to-earth. He mingled freely with us and his connection with Ratu Kadavulevu School, with whom he won the U18 Deans Trophy in 2015, was evident.
Uru represented Fiji in basketball and was part of the Fiji U20 rugby team.
Uru is respected for his talent and one who plays with baptism of fire. I’d love to see Uru play for the Fiji Water Flying Fijians.
My colleagues and I captured our meeting with Uru in the form of a memorable photograph.
One thing with our Fijian rugby players, no matter how big a rugby player they are, they don’t forget their roots and remain humble and friendly.
Wishing Uru all the best for his future endeavours!
Rajnesh Ishwar Lingam Nadawa, Nasinu
A-ha moments
Most of us have experienced what is commonly called an “aha moment” — that sudden flash of insight when something that was previously unclear suddenly makes perfect sense.
It may be as simple as seeing a familiar face on the street but being unable to remember the person’s name. Hours later, perhaps while driving, working, or having a cup of tea, the answer unexpectedly appears. “Aha! That’s who it was!” The puzzle is solved.
These moments of realisation occur in many areas of life. They can help us understand a problem, appreciate a new perspective, or recognise something that was previously hidden in plain sight. Often, wisdom arrives not in loud announcements but in quiet moments of reflection.
As our nation moves closer to another election cycle, I have observed what appear to be several “aha moments” among some political figures. Issues that may have once seemed unimportant are suddenly receiving greater attention. Concerns raised by ordinary citizens months or even years ago are now finding their way into speeches, policy discussions, and public statements.
Perhaps this is one of the benefits of democracy. Elections have a way of sharpening focus and encouraging leaders to listen more carefully to the voices of the people they serve. Voters, too, experience their own “aha moments” as they reflect on promises made, promises kept, and the future they hope to see for their communities and country.
The challenge for all of us is not merely to enjoy these moments of insight but to act upon them. Real progress occurs when realisation is followed by responsibility, understanding is followed by action, and good intentions are translated into meaningful outcomes.
The late American author Maya Angelou wisely observed, “When you know better, do better.” Perhaps that is the true value of an aha moment. It reminds us that growth begins when we are willing to see things differently.
Shiv Ram – TSA Suva
Contradictions and misconceptions
The ongoing debate about whether Fiji should be declared a Christian state has prompted me to write this.
From my understanding, Christianity is a label. Salvation is a gift. And following Jesus is a journey.
I sometimes wonder whether we’ve become confused about the difference between identifying ourselves as Christians and personally accepting Jesus Christ as our Lord and Saviour.
The two aren’t necessarily the same thing.
Christianity is the name given to a religion, a faith tradition and a community of believers. Salvation, however, is a gift of God’s grace, received through faith in Jesus Christ. It isn’t something we earn through religious practices, church attendance or good deeds.
We can be born into a Christian family, attend church every Sunday, know our Bible and participate in religious ceremonies. Yet the question remains: Have we personally accepted Jesus Christ and embraced the relationship He offers?
Perhaps one of the greatest misunderstandings is confusing religious observance with spiritual transformation.
Jesus didn’t simply invite people to adopt a religious identity. He invited them into a relationship with God and challenged them to live differently.
In John 13:35, Jesus said, “By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”
Notice the emphasis. Not on the label we carry, but on the love we demonstrate.
Being a follower of Jesus doesn’t mean being perfect. It means recognising our imperfections, accepting God’s grace and continually seeking to reflect His teachings through our words, actions, attitudes and relationships with others.
We don’t earn salvation by becoming good Christians. Rather, our desire to live differently should grow out of our gratitude for the gift we’ve received.
Perhaps it’s time we stopped measuring faith by religious labels and started reflecting on what it means to genuinely follow Jesus.
Christianity is a label. Salvation is a gift. Accepting Jesus is a personal decision. Following Him is a lifelong journey of love.
And perhaps the most important question isn’t whether we call ourselves Christians, but whether the way we live reflects the One whose name we profess.
Therein lies one of the greatest contradictions and misconceptions about our faith.
Colin Deoki Australia
Ra ready to defend home turf
Ra’s Narauyaba Sports Ground will host a huge battle this afternoon.
After wresting the prestigious INKK Farebrother Sullivan trophy from holders Naitasiri last Saturday (32-27) in a great and remarkable comeback, Ra is ready to battle the holders of the coveted Skipper Cup.
After seeing pictures and reading stories about the excitement in Ra, I thank FRU for taking this great match to Ra.
The warriors from Ra, who beat Naitasiri, played with sheer guts, courage and dedication to upset Naitasiri. They have earned the opportunity to defend the trophy on their home turf and let their fans enjoy the taste of Farebrother Sullivan trophy.
The vanua o Ra will unite to leave a lasting impression. They have been fundraising to meet the needs of their players just as Nadroga has been doing, and the community has stood tall and supported their players.
The Narauyaba ground will test both teams. The heat and hard surface will test the character, patience and fighting spirit of the players who should not complain about the surface but rise to the occasion.
The village elders will spur the players to deliver their best.
Playing in front of their vanua will bring out the resilience and determination of the Ra players led by the think tank, Peni Matawalu and the likes of Joseva Waqabaca, Livai Koro, Ilikana Waqa, Alipate Naura, Waisea Lawebuka, Rusiate Ramotiqa and Joseva Rateri.
Sireli Bobo has proved his credentials. He led Ra to victory in the 2026 Vodafone Vanua Championship Cup after defeating Northland 17-10.
That victory marked Ra’s first Vanua Cup title in 28 years. Today, Ra will aim for another piece of history- to topple the holders of the Skipper Cup.
This afternoon’s battle isn’t a game of rugby. It is about honouring the vanua o Ra and its lovely citizens. I’m banking on the Stallions to beat Ra as I’m a crazy Nadroga fan, but Ra will fight tooth and nail.
Rajnesh Ishwar Lingam Nadawa, Nasinu
Love and rehydration
Our love for rugby supersedes the scorching heat and dry spell imposed by the current super El Nino such that the Farebrother Sullivan Trophy Challenge at the Narauyaba Sports Ground will take place.
The dry and rough surface will not stop Ra and Nadroga from this all important clash.
While each team will be backed by their share of vocal supporters, the outcome of the match will be determined by the ability players to rehydrate throughout the match. All in all, what a match between two Western giants.
Floyd Robinson Micronesia
Provincial rugby darlings
As minnows Ra prepares for its first defence of the Farebrother Sullivan Trophy, the showpiece of provincial rugby in Fiji, against traditional powerhouse Nadroga, many are still coming to grips with the exploits of the new darlings of Fiji rugby.
You would have to ask Ratu Emori Bolobolo, the Tu Navitilevu in Rakiraki district, one of four traditional chiefs in the province, and a proud rugby son of Ra, having represented Fiji in rugby sevens in the nineties.
Some 30 years ago, Ratu Emori was part of the first Ra team, led by his elder brother, the late Ratu Meli, which mounted an unsuccessful Farebrother challenge against Suva.
However, against all odds in Suva last week, Ra wrote rugby history, scoring a scorcher of a try well after the final hooter had blown to dethrone Naitasiri.
Many have predicted that Ra’s hold of the Farebrother trophy will be short-lived as their tauvu from Nadroga are coming to town.
Well, I will just say that the ink has not dried. Maybe we are witnessing a great rugby revival. Last week was perhaps just the precursor of bigger things to come for Ra.
The venue, Narauyaba is a modest sports facility which was built over reclaimed, mamaqa mudflats. It’s quite dry at this time of the year though, but the setting and scenery is beautiful.
I am sure, whatever the result brings, this weekend will be one to relish for the town’s economy.
Samu Railoa Nadi
Trust must be earned
A second chance must be earned through accountability, not granted on the strength of regret alone. He says he regrets the two coups of 1987, but regret is not a record.
The test is not whether he can apologise for the past, but whether his conduct since gives the public reason to trust him with the future. Consider that conduct:
Sunday bans, another short-lived and regretful episode.
Declaring Fiji a Republic.
The 1997 Constitution which was thrown out unceremoniously.
The National Bank of Fiji which was emptied and closed.
Bringing back the GCC.
The Commission of Inquiry which no one knows where it is going.
Who knows what is happening with FICAC.
The endless dramas with Cabinet ministers.
And now, the back and forth over changes to the Constitution.
Most importantly, he established an embassy in Jerusalem whilst Israel was in the middle of committing genocide in Gaza.
Each of these episodes deserves scrutiny on its own merits.
Taken together, however, they point to a pattern of reversals and unfinished business, and listing them as achievements does not answer the central question: what has changed to justify renewed trust?
Faith may teach forgiveness, but public office demands accountability. Respect for tradition and culture does not require voters to suspend their judgement.
Before asking for another chance, a leader should explain what went wrong, accept responsibility for his own decisions and show concretely what he would do differently. Forgiveness is personal; a mandate to govern must be earned.
As I have always maintained, the people of Fiji are truly blessed. They deserve more than an endless supply of second chances.
Trust, like a second chance, is earned, not owed.
Jan Nissar Busan, South Korea
Diwali celebrations
During Diwali in Fiji, children and young people often walk through neighbourhoods calling out, “Aunty, kere sweets!”
They use the iTaukei word kerekere, meaning to ask or request. This year was no different: groups passed through our street one after another, asking for sweets.
Sharing sweets is a kind gesture, but these door-to-door visits can go on for hours. Repeated calls, excessive noise and, at times, cheeky or disrespectful behaviour can leave families with little privacy or chance to enjoy their celebrations in peace.
Preparing for Diwali takes considerable time, energy and money.
If families are repeatedly interrupted to serve passing groups, when can they celebrate with their own loved ones?
Many already have relatives, friends and neighbours to cater for. Offering sweets is an act of generosity, not a requirement.
Reasonable limits must be respected, and good manners are essential. If a household runs out of sweets, keeps its gates closed or does not celebrate Diwali, that choice should be accepted without argument or aggression.
No one should feel pressured or intimidated into giving.
We don’t visit villages at Christmas expecting families to prepare lovo for us, because we know that would be wrong. The same courtesy should be extended during Diwali: a celebration is not an invitation to demand things from those observing it.
Parents, guardians and village leaders should give children clear guidance: ask politely, accept a refusal graciously, respect closed gates, and never disturb or harass a household.
If these basic standards cannot be followed, the visits should not happen.
Sharing should build goodwill between communities, not leave families feeling exhausted, disrespected or compelled to give. Generosity deserves gratitude, and every family deserves the space to celebrate in peace.
Suresh Chand Nadi
What we can build
I am visiting South Korea with my family. The cleanliness, courtesy and level of development repeatedly remind me of Japan.
Yet the most striking comparison is not how these countries look today, but how far they have come. Both emerged from devastating wars to become economic powerhouses. Their experience challenges the idea that a painful past must dictate a nation’s future.
Fiji need not become another Japan or South Korea. The question is whether we are willing to draw a useful lesson from their recovery. Pride in a nation should inspire the work of building its future, not merely the defence of its past.
Aid can help, but it is not a substitute for taking responsibility for the future. Nor does blaming outsiders answer the practical question – what should we do differently? Criticism of the vulagi is no development strategy.
Tradition and culture deserve respect, but they should not be used to shield poor choices from scrutiny or to dismiss change.
The choice is not between preserving our identity and pursuing progress. It is between using our heritage as a foundation for the future and treating it as an excuse to stand still. Fiji’s future deserves an argument about what we can build — not whom we can blame.
Jan Nissar Seoul, South Korea
Democratic representation
Six candidates of Indian origin have secured seats in the United States House of Representatives following the recent 2026 midterm elections.
Nithya Raman has also made history by winning the Los Angeles mayoral race, while Dr Amish Shah has become the first Indian-American elected to Congress from Arizona.
Now, that’s what I call democratic representation, where voters have the opportunity to elect candidates based on their qualifications, abilities and policies rather than simply their ethnic backgrounds.
People of Indian origin are scattered across the globe and have made remarkable contributions in diverse fields, including science, information technology, space exploration, politics and entrepreneurship. Their achievements demonstrate that opportunities should never be restricted by ethnicity or cultural background.
Sadly, here in Fiji, there are still sections of society who harbour reservations about who should become Prime Minister and occupy positions of authority and leadership based purely on ethnicity. That’s primitive thinking, considering that we are now in the 21st century.
Why should the ethnic background of a prospective Prime Minister even be a matter of concern in a democratic and secular Fiji?
This narrow-minded and bird-brained intellect must be eradicated if we are serious about moving our beloved nation forward.
We cannot continue preaching equality and national unity while simultaneously entertaining ethnic prejudices when it comes to leadership.
Under Fiji’s constitutional framework, anyone who meets the prescribed eligibility requirements can aspire to become Prime Minister, provided they secure the necessary parliamentary support. The office is certainly not reserved exclusively for indigenous Fijians.
Perhaps it is time we took a leaf out of the United States’ democratic experience and judged prospective leaders on their merits, capabilities and vision rather than the colour of their skin or their ethnic lineage.
After all, leadership should be about what a person can contribute to the nation, not which ethnic group they belong to.
The power of the “Kai-India” brain is truly remarkable and can achieve wonders, as recently demonstrated by people of Indian origin in the US midterm elections.
Their achievements are a testament to the intelligence, determination and capabilities of the Indian diaspora across the globe.
Nishant Singh Lautoka
Thank you
Thank you Police Commissioner for your efforts in the eradication of drugs amidst our communities. We don’t hear instances of drug pedalling in our area now.
Rakesh Chand Sharma Nadi
Misplaced optimism
In his article ‘Steve’s heroic tale turning to ashes’ Professor Wadan Narsey catalogues how PM Rabuka “has engaged in betrayal after betrayal” in the last three years since his return to power (FT 13/11/26).
It is therefore logically perplexing how Wadan can continue to remain optimistic about Rabuka doing the right thing by the people of Fiji?
Wadan says in his concluding remarks “Mr Rabuka can concentrate on the 2027 election and let the new Parliament, hopefully with him still as Prime Minister, lead a genuine review of the Constitution based on what his own two commissions came up with”.
I believe this is misplaced optimism on the part of Wadan .
Rabuka’s track record shows his main preoccupation is concentrating power in his own hands.
Rabuka will never leave a heroic tale “Steve: a Fijian movie for the ages” as Wadan mistakenly believes.
There is nothing heroic about Rabuka’s legacy.
(I believe Rabuka is ultimately responsible for taking our beloved country down the toilet).
Rajend Naidu Sydney, Australia
Tale of betrayals
Reading through Professor Wadan Narsey’s article (FT 13/11) made me again appraise myself of the state of politics, economics and the welfare of Fiji’s population.
When Professor Narsey says, “Sadly in the last three years, Mr Rabuka has engaged in betrayal after betrayal”, I am reminded of a Hindi idiom frequently used to describe our situation.
“Andher Nagri Chaupat Raja” meaning – a city (nation) in darkness, a ruler actively causing ruin. It conveys systemic collapse: lawlessness, mismanagement, injustice, and moral decline under bad leadership.
Rakesh Chand Sharma Nadi
Do the sums
Perhaps our PM might care to get out a calculator and do a few sums in view of the fact that he is setting his sights on an outright victory in the coming election.
The original number of affected FNPF pensioners was 14,000. If we suppose that they had an average of four grandchildren each, that is a grand total of 56,000 people, and the minimum number of people interested in the outcome of the FNPF saga.
But Fiji is an extended family orientated society. Inevitably there will be pensioners who feel family loyalty – gratitude – concern – obligation – ambition for their loved ones.
The family are interested parties because in most cases the pensioner in the family will have planned to help their children and grandchildren: to pay the school fees – set up a small business perhaps – or help to buy or rent business premises – or send one or more to uni – or to undertake further education overseas – or buy a house or a car or a business vehicle.
The pensioner’s immediate family, children and grandchildren, had hopes and expectations. Then there is the wider family to consider, and often some close friends – all with their hopes and dreams dashed.
Admitting that the numbers above cannot be absolutely accurate, they are yet of viable value, and one can expect that a minimum of 56,000 votes will be lost by the PAP.
Mr PM, sir, do the right thing by the abandoned pensioners and those votes would most certainly be yours!
Sue Cauty Pacific Harbour
Pensioners’ nightmare
Fiji is very uniquely placed – an island nation in the South Pacific.
She has the South Pacific’s largest financial institution in the Fiji National Provident Fund. A reported portfolio of $12.1billion and $2billion cash in bank.
At the behest of former prime minister, Voreqe Bainimarama and his right-hand man, former Minister of Finance and attorney-general, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, worked with FNPF.
Drastically reduced irrevocable pensions were forced down on 2012 pensioners’ throats. No choice. It was a case of “my way or highway”.
This was first class betrayal, cruelty, heartlessness, at its best… with no proof of insolvency.
How much trust do FNPF enjoy today?
We hear only about 3% of current members opt for pensions. Alarm bells must be ringing. FNPF “invests” thousand of dollars in advertisements promoting their 60-year-old product. Is this the way the world should be? 2012 pensioners remain betrayed.
Meanwhile, FNPF chairman, their executives, the board members, legal counsels and all employees enjoy handsome remuneration. Top six figure dollars for some executives? Am I wrong?
And hey, I hear there is still no member’s representative on the Board – only seven “top guns”. Something is grossly amiss. Is this discriminatory? Who provides genuine oversight?
The members own FNPF.
Members’ contributions in 2025 topped a historic record of over $1billion. This is no mean feat.
Have I erred on the side of caution? If so, my apologies.
FNPF reportedly has about 264,000 active contributing members.
FNPF reportedly state membership of about 436,000 members.
For the betrayed 2012 pensioners, justice is definitely delayed; and definitely denied. We will persevere and fight on till our last breath. Another “David and Goliath” saga is slowly unfolding. The world is watching.
Ronnie Chang Nadi
Does anyone care?
Does anyone still care about the elderly pensioners who were deprived of their hard-earned savings entrusted to the Fiji National Provident Fund?
Or has this become just another inconvenient chapter in Fiji’s history, dismissed as old news, quietly pushed aside and conveniently forgotten because pursuing justice is simply too difficult or politically uncomfortable and inconvenient?
Let me ask another question.
Does the failure to provide restitution personally affect me? Not in the slightest. I live in Australia. My circumstances aren’t dependent on whether these pensioners receive what’s rightfully theirs.
So why should someone like me, living in another country, become so deeply angered by something that happened years ago?
Because injustice riles me. And some injustices should never be allowed to become yesterday’s news.
What particularly angers me is that the people affected are elderly citizens who, after a lifetime of working, contributing and sacrificing, should be enjoying the security and dignity of their retirement.
They entrusted their hard-earned money to an institution established to protect their financial future. They did so in good faith, believing that their contributions would provide a measure of security when they could no longer work.
For many, that promise was their safety net. They’d planned their life around it knowing how it would help them live out their final years with some measure of stability and happiness.
To take away the security of that safety net is more than a financial decision. It’s a devastating blow to their dignity, their independence and their sense of self-worth and justice.
It sends an unconscionable message to people who’ve already given the best years of their lives: that their sacrifices can be discounted, their expectations disregarded and their voices ignored simply because they are now too old, too vulnerable or too powerless to fight back.
And that’s where the real shame lies and what makes me so angry.
How can anyone entrusted with public responsibility sleep comfortably knowing that elderly citizens are still waiting for justice? How can explanations, institutional justifications and bureaucratic bulldust continue to take precedence over the human lives affected?
It’s easy to sit in comfortable airconditioned offices, surrounded by paperwork, legal opinions and financial reports. It’s considerably harder to look an elderly pensioner in the eye and explain why the security they worked so hard for throughout their lifetime hasn’t been restored.
Perhaps those responsible have convinced themselves that the decisions made were necessary to protect the institution. Perhaps they have repeated those justifications so often that they now sit comfortably with their conscience. A conscience that’s become desensitised and devoid of justice, respect and integrity.
But protecting an institution should never become an excuse for abandoning the very people it was established to serve.
An institution exists for people. People don’t exist to serve an institution.
And here’s what I find particularly disturbing: time doesn’t erase an injustice. Nor does the passing of years extinguish an obligation to put things right.
I have no personal financial interest in this matter. I am not seeking recognition, political favour or personal gain.
I’m simply someone who believes that doing the right thing should never be conditional on whether it’s convenient, popular or financially comfortable.
So, to those who have the authority, the responsibility and the opportunity to help bring this matter to a just conclusion, I have one simple message.
I hope that the voices of these pensioners find their way into your conscience daily like a record needle stuck on a damaged groove. I hope their circumstances disturb your comfortable assumptions at every turn and every opportunity. I hope that when you put your head on your pillow at night, you’re feeling you should correct this and ask yourself whether you’ve done everything within your power to make things right.
And if the honest answer is no, then perhaps it’s time to stop finding reasons why restitution can’t happen and start finding ways to make it happen.
Justice delayed is painful. Justice abandoned is unforgivable.
These elderly citizens aren’t asking for charity. They’re asking for what they believe is rightfully theirs: fairness, accountability and the dignity they deserve.
There’s still an opportunity to correct this injustice so you can sleep in peace and know that you did something right and feel good about it, knowing in your heart of hearts that you contributed to resolving a great injustice that was done by the previous administration.
Don’t allow another year to pass with more explanations, more excuses and more empty assurances.
Make restitution. Restore dignity. Give these pensioners a reason to believe that justice in Fiji is more than a convenient word used by those in positions of power.
And perhaps, in doing so, you might also rediscover something of immeasurable value yourself.
The peace that comes from knowing you finally did the right thing to give hope and dignity back to some of the most vulnerable and deserving in our society – the deprived elderly.
Honour them like you would honour your own father and mother.
Because when you do that, it will align with the One who decreed the commandment about Honour.
Colin Deoki Australia
Forgive and move on
I refer to Dr Prashneel Goundar’s letter titled “Coup leader” (FT: 13/11).
I wish to remind Dr Goundar that my letter titled “Speight, Turner march on” was entirely based on George Speight’s achievement in sports and had nothing to do with politics or coups.
I did not elaborate on his past and involvement in the 2000 upheaval.
My letter was based on what Speight achieved for the nation — a gold medal in the 2026 Masters IV bench press 93kg category at the Oceania Regional Powerlifting Championships at the FMF Gymnasium.
Speight etched his name in history books, becoming the first athlete from Fiji to win a gold medal.
Speight also set a new Oceania record with a 107.5kg lift.
I mentioned in my letter that the guy was full of life and energy.
I also mentioned that age should not be a barrier towards sports achievements and that it should never prevent anyone from pursuing new interests, staying active and testing their limits.
That’s all Dr Goundar.
As for the 2000 coup, I witnessed what transpired and it’s a pity that neither you nor I can change what happened 26 years ago.
The nation has moved forward, and Speight has sought forgiveness from the nation.
If we continue harping about the 2000 coup and taking shots from Australia, then nothing will change.
And yes, Dr Goundar, I haven’t left my country of birth, very much contributing as a productive citizen.
If you are really concerned about Fiji, return and serve the nation just as I am doing.
Otherwise, my best wishes to you!
Don’t mix sports with politics or coups.
Speight has served his time in prison and like any other prisoner he deserves a second shot at life.
We need to change our mindset towards Speight.
Forgive and move on with life!
Rajnesh Ishwar Lingam Nadawa, Nasinu
Glorifying treasonists
DR Prashneel Gounder has written a compelling and thought-provoking piece on coup leaders (FT 13/11).
He has rightly highlighted the devastating consequences of overthrowing a democratically elected government and the long-term damage such actions inflict on the economy, democratic institutions and ordinary citizens.
How on Earth can anyone glorify a coup leader who, under the convenient pretext of protecting indigenous sovereignty, helped plunge Fiji into political turmoil, undermine democratic principles and legitimise unlawful practices that targeted minority communities (specifically Indo-Fijians)?
Is that something to celebrate or be proud of? Appalling indeed.
Violence, looting and the unconstitutional seizure of power have done absolutely nothing to transform the lives of ordinary Fijians, particularly the indigenous population in whose name these actions were supposedly justified.
Decades later, a substantial proportion (approximately 75 per cent) of indigenous Fijians continue to grapple with abject poverty, crime, unemployment and deep-rooted social problems. Where is the promised prosperity? Where are the tangible benefits of all that so-called protection and fighting for the “indigenous cause?”
Enough with the glorification and romanticising of treasonists.
A military or civilian takeover is not an act of patriotism, and destroying democracy cannot suddenly become noble simply because it is wrapped in the rhetoric of native rights and sovereignty.
Open your eyes wide and stop living in denial.
Fiji is not the success story some would have us believe.
We are still paying the price for our political misadventures, and ordinary Fijians continue to bear the consequences.
It is high time we stopped glorifying those who seized power and started confronting the damage they left behind.
No wonder Fiji’s economic progress and financial prosperity has remained stagnant since 1987.
Nearly four decades of political instability, coups and uncertainty have taken their toll on the nation’s economy, investor confidence and the livelihoods of ordinary Fijians.
And no, I believe George Speight did absolutely no favours for indigenous Fijians, despite what some have been led to believe.
His actions in 2000 only brought political instability, economic hardship and international embarrassment to Fiji.
So why continue to glorify him and treat him like some kind of saint?
Since when did overthrowing a democratically elected government become an act worthy of admiration?
Nishant Singh Lautoka
Priority shift
Will the current drought and El Nino conditions have an impact on our kava consumption? Well, with the challenge between Ra and Nadroga and Fiji versus Ireland, one can anticipate a priority shift this weekend in terms of water.
Let us hope the best for Ra in their first defence as this is their first acid test, given that Nadroga will not hold back from attempting to secure another prized trophy.
Let us also allow coach Jake White the opportunity to test new players and not forget that he has only just started in his new role. Also, the Irish team appears to be peaking after a few years of sitting in the doldrums.
At the end of the day, it is that baby mix which matters most because it is within our control. Let us allow the rugby players to do best, what they are best at.
Let us allow a baby mix to quench our thirst and possibly drown our rugby sorrows come this weekend.
More importantly, when the referee signals the end of the match, let us not act like babies and accept the results.
Floyd Robinson Micronesia
El Niño preparedness
Premila Kumar’s criticism of the Coalition Government (FT13/11) over its handling of the emerging El Niño situation raises an important question: when politicians point fingers at those currently in government, should they also be prepared to have their own records examined?
Nobody should dispute the seriousness of the El Niño threat facing Fiji.
Farmers, livestock owners, rural communities and ordinary households are concerned about water shortages, food security and the rising cost of living.
These are genuine national concerns that deserve urgent attention, not political point-scoring. However, Ms Kumar was herself part of the FijiFirst Government from 2018 to 2022, holding several ministerial portfolios, including Industry, Trade, Tourism and Local Government.
It is also worth remembering that she was the Minister responsible for Tourism when the COVID-19 pandemic brought international travel and tourism to an unprecedented standstill in 2020.
During that period, Fiji progressively introduced international travel restrictions, eventually suspending scheduled passenger flights through Nadi International Airport while allowing special repatriation flights to continue.
These were extraordinary circumstances, and decisions were made across Government, involving health authorities and other agencies.
The point is not to attribute the arrival of COVID-19 to one minister, but to recognise that every administration has faced difficult national challenges requiring decisions under pressure. Ms Kumar knows what it means to hold ministerial responsibility. She also knows that governing a country involves competing priorities, limited resources and challenges that do not always come with straightforward solutions.
While her responsibility as an Opposition MP is to scrutinise the Government, that responsibility should also come with consistency, constructive criticism and a willingness to acknowledge the complexities of governing.
El Niño is not a political invention, nor is climate vulnerability unique to the present administration, just like COVID.
Fiji has faced droughts and extreme weather conditions under successive governments.
Therefore, the question should not simply be who failed, but what lessons have been learned, what preparations were made, and what more needs to be done.
Did the Opposition mention a Preparation Portfolio be set, when the scent was in the air?
Talking about the team who experienced a term that successfully dragged our nation through a pandemic, that met a huge heap of debt at the end of the tunnel. If the Coalition Government has fallen short, let the shortcomings be identified with evidence.
If preparations have been inadequate, let the Opposition propose practical measures to address the situation.
Equally, the Government must be transparent about what it has done, what remains outstanding and how affected communities will be assisted.
Our people do not need politicians competing over who can deliver the sharpest criticism. They need water security, protection for farmers, support for vulnerable families and a coordinated national response.
Political accountability must work in both directions. Those who once occupied ministerial offices should understand that public scrutiny is not reserved exclusively for the government of the day.
Fiji’s people deserve solutions, not merely accusations.
Peceli Alistir Waitolu, Naitasiri
Make it welcoming
I have recently observed that several areas of Nadi Town remain poorly lit, creating an unsettling and unsafe environment.
In some areas, nearly all the streetlights are either too dim because of unsuitable bulbs or have been missing for quite some time without being replaced.
This situation highlights the importance of well-maintained street lighting in a town that aspires to be a tourism hub.
The town administration must make addressing this problem an immediate priority.
For instance, the vicinity around MaxValu and the entire market area remain noticeably dark after sunset. Similarly, the bus stand and its surroundings are shrouded in shadows, making it difficult for residents and visitors to navigate safely. Other areas also urgently need attention, but limited space prevents me from listing them all.
Proper street lighting not only improves safety but also enhances the appeal and convenience of an urban area. As a tourism centre, Nadi Town owes its residents and visitors a safe, welcoming atmosphere both day and night.
Prompt action would improve the town’s image and create a more enjoyable experience for everyone. The current situation suggests that the town’s maintenance and upkeep have been neglected, reflecting misplaced priorities.
It is little wonder that many people, including tourists, prefer to spend their evenings on Denarau and Martintar, where the environment feels safer and more welcoming.
Suresh Chand Nadi
