Housing plan sparks backlash

Listen to this article:

Residents of Pacific Harbor gathered over the weekend to oppose the proposal by Speedy Heros Ltd. Picture: JAKE WISE

CONCERNS are mounting that a proposed 61-lot gated residential development on part of Pacific Harbour’s historic golf course could place pressure on the community’s infrastructure and exceed the capacity envisaged in the area’s original masterplan.

Residents gathered over the weekend to oppose the proposal by Speedy Heros Ltd, raising concerns over infrastructure capacity, the loss of part of an established recreational asset, environmental impacts and what they say was a lack of meaningful community consultation.

Planning approval has been issued for the subdivision of Lot 2 DP 4114, River Drive, Pacific Harbour, into 61 residential lots, an open space reserve and an access road, subject to planning, engineering and environmental conditions.

Pacific Harbour resident Mark Sperling said residents were concerned they had only recently learned that approval had been granted.

“We’re very pleased we’ve had a good turnout,” Mr Sperling said. “The residents of Pacific Harbour that have just heard about it, obviously we are very upset about it.”

Mr Sperling said removing two holes from the golf course would reduce it from 18 holes to 16, potentially affecting its championship status.

Resident Viliame Takayawa said the golf course had significant sporting and historical value, having hosted international players including Greg Norman and Vijay Singh.

“There’s a lot of history attached to this golf course,” Mr Tawakaya said.

“It’s not about who plays and who’s staying around here. It’s the heritage.”

Submissions to planning authorities describe the golf course as a defining feature of Pacific Harbour for more than 50 years, contributing to tourism, property values, recreation and community identity.

Residents say they are not opposed to development, but want authorities to reconsider the approval, conduct further consultation and demonstrate that the project can be supported by existing infrastructure without undermining the viability of the remaining golf course.