SG Ropate Green denies political interference in Malimali pick

Listen to this article:

Solicitor General, Ropate Green Picture: JONACANI LALAKOBAU

Solicitor General and Secretary of the Constitutional Offices Commission, Ropate Green testified that there was “no political pressure or external influence” in the process to appoint Barbara Malimali as FICAC Commissioner.

This is stated in the Commission of Inquiry reported that was released on Tuesday.

“The role of FICAC Commissioner was first advertised on 15 June 2024, attracting 15 applicants,” the CoI report quotes Mr Green as testifying.

He said on 10 July 2024, the Judicial Services Commission decided to re-advertise the position to attract more qualified applicants, ultimately receiving 23 applications.

A Selection Panel comprising Mr. Green, Chief Justice Salesi Temo, and Chief Magistrate Josaia Waqaivolavola shortlisted and interviewed four candidates, after two withdrew.

The JSC Selection Panel unanimously recommended Ms. Malimali as the most meritorious candidate.

Mr Green confirmed that at no point during the process was the JSC or the JSC Selection Panel made aware of an ongoing FICAC investigation into Ms. Malimali.”

“A formal minute was circulated to the JSC members asking that they endorse the recommendation.”

“The A-G was consulted on 2 September 2024 and, per the FICAC Act, was treated as a consultee, not an advisor.”

“Mr. Green asserted there was no political pressure or external influence in the process and emphasized the appointment was made in accordance with s 5 of the FICAC Act.”

Mr. Green testified that he became aware of the FICAC investigation into Ms. Malimali only on 5 September 2024, the day of her arrest.

“He stated that FICAC did not formally notify the COC or his office about the investigation.”

“He did not reach out to FICAC proactively to verify the claims before the appointment was made.”