Parties in the case involving Suva lawyer Tanya Waqanika have been urged to refrain from publicly discussing matters before the court and to maintain professional decorum.
Magistrate Yogesh Prasad issued the direction after the prosecution raised concerns about public commentary by Ms Waqanika, describing it as misleading and sub judice.
The commentary stemmed from the previous court appearance, where the defence sought clarification on whether the charge related to a general or municipal election. However, prosecutor Rusiate Doidoi confirmed yesterday that the charge does not concern any election, citing Section 14(1)(d) of the Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) Act 2013. He said the provision prohibits a public officer from publicly indicating support for or opposition to a political party.
Ms Waqanika faces one count of publicly indicating opposition to a political party. FICAC alleges that on April 19, 2024, while serving as a board member of Investment Fiji and Telecom Fiji Ltd, she posted comments on Facebook opposing SODELPA.
Defence lawyer Barbara Malimali argued that FICAC was being overly sensitive and maintained her client was merely raising questions.
Magistrate Prasad reminded parties of the presumption of innocence and adjourned the matter to March 24. Ms Waqanika’s application to permanently stay proceedings will be heard on March 20.
