OPINION | The asymmetry of meaning – What we are fighting to keep

Listen to this article:

The highland of Nadarivatu. The writer says the Deed of Cession — the document that, for all intents and purposes, was the first constitution of Fiji, guaranteed our lands, our fishing rights, our forests, and everything beneath the soil and above it. Picture: BALJEET SINGH

There is a kind of pragmatism taught in the halls of power — a cold, transactional view of conflict that reduces struggle to a matter of resources, influence, and strategic advantage. It is a worldview that assumes every people, when pressed, will ultimately trade principle for comfort, identity for security. But history; and the lived experience of those who have been pushed to the edge, tells a different story. It tells us that when a people believe they are fighting for their very existence — for dignity, for honour, for the right to simply remain who they are — no amount of material pressure can break them.

I have watched this truth play out in distant lands; where communities under siege endure decades of occupation and blockade, yet refuse to surrender their identity. Their motivation is not measured in barrels of oil or strategic real estate.

It is measured in something far more elemental: survival as a people, the preservation of honour, and a conviction that some things are worth more than life itself. When death is understood not as an ending, but as a continuation of a people’s story, the calculus of the powerful collapses. You cannot deter those who have already made peace with sacrifice.

This is not merely a philosophical observation. It is the lens through which I see us; the iTaukei, standing at a precipice of our own.

For us, the existential threat is not written in military communiqués, but in constitutions. It lives in the slow erosion of a compact that our chiefs had the foresight to secure more than a century ago. In 1874, when our Chiefs ceded sovereignty to the Crown, they did not do so blindly. They insisted on protections. And those protections were enshrined in the Deed of Cession — the document that, for all intents and purposes, was the first constitution of Fiji. It guaranteed our lands, our fishing rights, our forests, and everything beneath the soil and above it. It was a covenant that acknowledged: Governance may pass, but the foundation of iTaukei existence shall remain inviolable.

That covenant was our guarantee. It was the recognition that we entered the modern world not; as a conquered people, but as a people who had secured a sacred bond. For generations, that bond held. Colonial administrators, for all their failings, operated within its framework.

Land remained in customary hands. Fishing grounds sustained our villages. Our identity, anchored to the vanua, was not up for negotiation.

But independence brought a quiet undoing. The Deed of Cession, the original compact, was slowly buried beneath successive constitutions drafted in times of political upheaval and foreign influence.

Each new constitution drifted further from that founding promise. And today, the iTaukei find ourselves in a bewildering and painful position: we are poor in our own land. The waters that once fed our families are licensed away. The resources beneath our feet are treated as commodities. The very identity that the Deed was meant to protect, feels increasingly fragile, subject to the whims of whoever holds power.

This is why the Bose Levu Vakaturaga, has insisted that the Deed of Cession must be restored as the foundational document for any new constitution. To some, this demand appears nostalgic — a reach for a colonial artifact. But to us, it is nothing less than a matter of survival. The Deed is not a relic; it is the only legal instrument that ever genuinely protected our way of life. Without it, every subsequent constitution has been built on sand. Without it, our rights remain vulnerable to the shifting tides of politics and the pressures of those who see our land only as an asset to be developed. What we are facing is an existential threat. It arrives in parliamentary debates, in land-use policies, in constitutional review commissions; that treat the iTaukei as one stakeholder among many rather than as the people whose ancestors made the original compact, that allowed this nation to exist.

When we say we are fighting for our survival, we mean that the erosion of the Deed of Cession has left us untethered from the one promise that guaranteed our future.

And yet, people often misunderstand this kind of struggle. It assumes that economic marginalisation will eventually force acquiescence. It assumes that a people who have been poor in their own land for generations, will eventually abandon their claims in exchange for development or stability. But that assumption fails to grasp the deeper truth: a people who believe they have nothing left to lose, become immovable.

The iTaukei have endured colonial displacement, the upheavals of independence, successive coups, and a parade of constitutions, drafted without our original compact. We have not disappeared. The resilience that sustains communities under occupation elsewhere, is the same resilience that keeps us rooted in our vanua, our traditions. It is the same resilience that refuses to let the Deed of Cession be relegated to a museum.

History is clear: You cannot defeat a people who have made their peace with sacrifice. For us, the sacrifice is not necessarily of blood, but of comfort, of patience, of the willingness to wait generation after generation for the restoration of what was promised.

The BLV speaks not only for the present, but for the ancestors who signed that Deed and for the descendants who deserve to inherit its protections. When we demand the return of the Deed as the foundation of our constitution, we are not making a political argument. We are asserting that a covenant, once made, must be honoured.

This is the asymmetry of meaning, that most so often fail to understand. Strategic interests, economic pressures, constitutional manoeuvring — these are the weapons of those who view this as a chess game. But for those fighting for dignity, for identity, for the very survival of their people, the calculus is different. There is no bargaining chip large enough to trade away existence. There is no constitution legitimate enough to replace the one that was first agreed upon.

The iTaukei have waited. We have endured. And we remain clear on what is required: The Deed of Cession must be restored as the foundational document of Fiji, and our rights to our lands, our waters, and our identity must be placed beyond the reach of future political expediency. This is not a demand for special privilege. It is a demand for the fulfillment of the original promise — the promise without which Fiji would not exist as it does today.

Until that promise is honoured, our struggle continues. Not with weapons, but with the quiet, unyielding persistence of a people, who know that some things are worth more than comfort, more than wealth, more than the fleeting assurances of those who hold power today. We are fighting for our survival. And as history has shown, when a people fights for its very existence, it is not easily defeated.