The Fiji Council of Social Services (FCOSS) has warned that the proposed National Referendum Bill 2025 is “significantly weak” on core democratic principles and may contravene international standards for free suffrage.
In a submission to the Standing Committee on Justice, Law, and Human Rights yesterday, FCOSS executive director Vani Catanasiga said while the bill was procedurally sound, it contained “severe restrictions” that could stifle public debate.
Ms Catanasiga said a “near total ban” on political campaigning in Clauses 22 and 23 was a major concern.
“I think the most critical deviation is the near total ban on political campaigning… which prohibits all persons except the supervisor for elections from displaying symbols, advertisements and engaging in canvassing,” Ms Catanasiga said.
“This directly contradicts the international principle of freedom of expression and the need for robust public debate.”
Ms Catanasiga also raised concerns about the short timeline for public awareness. Clause 11 only requires the referendum question to be published five days before polling.
“International best practice recommends a minimum of four weeks to allow for public scrutiny, debate and for voters to fully understand the question before they vote.”
She compared the timeframe to the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice Referendum, where voters had seven months for discussion before heading to the polls.
FCOSS program manager Josaia Tokoni urged the committee to amend Clause 24 to allow civil society representatives to observe the process alongside political parties, enhancing transparency.
“The tone of the act should be changed to one that encourages and affirms wide participation and free public debate by citizens,” Mr Tokoni said.
He warned the current restrictions could deepen voter apathy, especially among youth.
While FCOSS commended the bill’s strong anti-fraud measures and multilingual accessibility, they maintained that substantive changes were necessary.
“The bill is sound on procedural integrity… however, it is significantly weak on the core democratic principles,” Ms Catanasiga said.
